Close Menu
  • Home
  • News
    • Local
    • National
    • State
    • World
  • Obituaries
  • Events
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Weather
    • Climate
    • Hurricane Videos
  • Classifieds
    • Classifed Ads
We're Social
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
Trending
  • I Blended Blanch and Ammonia—My Mom-in-Regulation Freaked Out (Turns Out, She Used to be Proper) – ViralNova
  • Harvard international pupil visas focused in Trump management proclamation
  • Garden Red meat Offered at Complete Meals Would possibly Be Infected With E. Coli
  • U.S. Is Trimming Again Its Choice of Client Worth Knowledge
  • Ilona Maher Loves Her Frame On Sports activities Illustrated Preserve
  • Silhoutte of the Tomb Raider will get Denuvo removing spice up
  • Absolute best desktop PC laptop offers for June 2025
  • Hurricane Crew 3: Scattered downpour most probably once more on Thursday
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Savannah Herald
  • Home
  • News
    • Local
    • National
    • State
    • World
  • Obituaries
  • Events
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Weather
    • Climate
    • Hurricane Videos
  • Classifieds
    • Classifed Ads
Savannah Herald
Home»Politics»Some Republican-led states refuse to let Justice Department monitors into polling places
Politics

Some Republican-led states refuse to let Justice Department monitors into polling places

Savannah HeraldBy Savannah HeraldNovember 5, 20246 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

WASHINGTON (AP) — Some Republican-led states say they will block the Justice Department’s election monitors from going inside polling places on Election Day, pushing back on federal authorities’ decades-long practice of watching for violations of federal voting laws.

Officials in Florida and Texas have said they won’t allow federal election monitors into polling sites on Tuesday. And on Monday, Missouri filed a lawsuit seeking a court order to block federal officials from observing inside polling places. Texas followed with a similar lawsuit seeking to permanently bar federal monitoring of elections in the state.

The Justice Department announced last week that it’s deploying election monitors in 86 jurisdictions across 27 states on Election Day. The Justice Department declined to comment on the moves by the Republican-led states, but filed court papers urging the judge to deny Missouri’s request.

The race between Democratic nominee Kamala Harris and Republican nominee Donald Trump is a dead heat, and both sides are bracing for potential legal challenges to vote tallies. The Justice Department’s election monitoring effort, a long practice under both Democratic and Republican administrations, is meant to ensure that federal voting rights are being followed.

Here’s a look at election monitors and the states’ actions:

Who are the election monitors?

Election monitors are lawyers who work for the Justice Department, including in the civil rights division and U.S. attorney’s offices across the country. They are not law enforcement officers or federal agents.

For decades, the Justice Department’s civil rights division has sent attorneys and staff members to monitor polling places across the country in both federal and non-federal elections. The monitors are tasked with ensuring compliance with federal voting rights laws.

The Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division enforces a number of statutes protecting the right to vote. That includes the Voting Rights Act, which prohibits intimidation and threats against those who are casting ballots or counting votes. And it includes the Americans with Disabilities Act, which mandates that election officials ensure people with disabilities have the full and equal opportunity to vote.

“The Department of Justice has a nearly 60-year history of addressing Election Day issues to safeguard the voting rights of Black citizens and other communities of color,” said Edward Casper, acting co-chief counsel at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. “While some recent efforts to interfere in this process may appear more bark than bite, they still pose a real threat to civil rights enforcement,” he said.

Where are election monitors being sent?

The 86 jurisdictions that the Justice Department will send monitors to on Tuesday include Maricopa County, Arizona and Fulton County, Georgia, which in 2020 became the center of election conspiracy theories spread by Trump and other Republicans. Another place on the list is Portage County, Ohio, where a sheriff came under fire for a social media post in which he said people with Harris yard signs should have their addresses recorded so that immigrants can be sent to live with them if the Democrat wins the presidency.

Other areas where federal monitors will be sent include Detroit; Queens, New York; Providence, Rhode Island; Jackson County, South Dakota; Salem, Massachusetts; Milwaukee; Manassas, Virginia; Cuyahoga County, Ohio; and Northwest Arctic Borough, Alaska. The Justice Department’s monitors will be in St. Louis, four jurisdictions in Florida and eight jurisdictions in Texas.

What’s happening in Missouri?

In filing the lawsuit Monday, Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft said state law “clearly and specifically limits who may be in polling places.” He also accused the federal government of “attempting to illegally interfere in Missouri’s elections.”

The lawsuit states that Missouri law “permits only certain categories of persons to be present in voting locations, including voters, minor children accompanying voters, poll workers, election judges, etc.” and not federal officials.

The Justice Department also sought to monitor polling places in Missouri in 2022. The agency planned to have officials at Cole County, which includes Jefferson City, the state capital. County Clerk Steve Korsmeyer said he wouldn’t let them in if they show up.

The federal agency backed down after Ashcroft showed Justice Department officials the state law, Ashcroft said. He says the Justice Department is now “trying to go through the back door” by contacting local election officials for access.

Messages were left Monday with the St. Louis Board of Election Commissioners.

In court papers filed late Monday, the Justice Department said it has authority to conduct monitoring there under a settlement agreement with the St. Louis Board aimed at ensuring people with mobility and vision impairments can access polling places. The settlement was reached in 2021 under Trump’s Justice Department after federal officials found problems, such as ramps that were too steep and inaccessible parking, according to the court papers. The settlement, which expires next year, says the board must “cooperate fully” with Justice Department’s efforts to monitor compliance, “including but not limited to providing the United States with timely access to polling places (including on Election Day).”

The Justice Department said an attorney and investigator from its Disability Rights Section are in St. Louis to inspect for accessibility issues Tuesday. The department has carried out such inspections under the settlement agreement on “multiple occasions,” including in the April local elections, government lawyers said in court documents.

What are the other states saying?

In a letter to the Justice Department on Friday, Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson said wrote, “Texas law is clear: Justice Department monitors are not permitted inside polling places where ballots are being cast or a central counting station where ballots are being counted.”

“Texas has a robust processes and procedures in place to ensure that eligible voters may participate in a free and fair election,” Nelson wrote.

In a similar letter Friday, Florida Secretary of State Cord Byrd told the Justice Department that Florida law lists who is allowed inside the state’s polling places and Justice Department officials are not included. Byrd said Florida is sending its own monitors to the four jurisdictions the Justice Department plans to send staff to and they will “ensure there is no interference with the voting process.”



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Savannah Herald
  • Website

Related Posts

Politics June 5, 2025

Harvard international pupil visas focused in Trump management proclamation

Politics June 5, 2025

Pleasure-Ann Reid Finds Actual Explanation why In the back of Why MSNBC Forbidden Her Display

Politics June 3, 2025

DHS says FEMA head used to be joking when he mentioned he wasn’t conscious about storm season

Politics June 3, 2025

Glynn County College District: 5,238 white scholars had been enrolled in 2023-24 college generation

Politics June 1, 2025

The Saga Of RFK Jr., Dr. Oz., And The Most likely Infectious Canadian Ostrich Wobble

Politics May 31, 2025

Appeals courtroom lets in President Trump to proceed gathering price lists

Comments are closed.

Don't Miss
Tech December 18, 2024

South African Tyme Workforce Turns into Africa’s Fresh Unicorn Later $250M Layout D Investment

South African-based fintech Tyme Workforce has attained unicorn condition later securing $250 million in a…

Kanye West Being Sued For Sexual Assault By Former Model

November 24, 2024

Coca-Cola Amphitheater Coming to Birmingham’s Northside Folk

November 13, 2024

Ryan Destiny & More Stun At ‘The Fire Inside’ Premiere

December 8, 2024

5 takeaways from the Vance-Walz VP debate

October 2, 2024
Categories
  • Business
  • Classifed Ads
  • Climate
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Gaming
  • Health
  • Local
  • National
  • Politics
  • Science
  • Sports
  • State
  • Tech
  • Tourism
  • World
About Us
About Us

Savannah Herald is your trusted source for the pulse of Coastal Georgia and beyond. We're committed to delivering authentic, timely news that resonates with our community.

From local politics to business developments, we're here to keep you informed and engaged. Our mission is to amplify the voices and stories that matter, shining a light on our collective experiences and achievements.
We cover:
🏛️ Politics
💼 Business
🎭 Entertainment
🏀 Sports
🩺 Health
💻 Technology
Savannah Herald: Savannah's Black Voice 💪🏾

Our Picks

Pharrell Explains Why New Lego Biopic Almost Didn’t Get Made

October 12, 2024

Aesthetic: Harvard Grad Spearheads AI Fashion Brand Re-Imagining Shopping

November 1, 2024

It’s called an urgent care emergency center — but which is it?

September 26, 2024

Arrested for Singing While Female, in “My Orange Garden”

May 16, 2025

Trump faucets RFK Jr. to supremacy HHS

November 15, 2024
Categories
  • Business
  • Classifed Ads
  • Climate
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Gaming
  • Health
  • Local
  • National
  • Politics
  • Science
  • Sports
  • State
  • Tech
  • Tourism
  • World
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Opt-Out Preferences
Copyright © 2002-2025 Savannahherald.com All Rights Reserved. A Veteran-Owned Business

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.